Fundamentalism and its Similarities with Reformed Theology
- The inspiration and verbal inerrancy of Scripture
- The Deity of Christ and the virgin Birth
- The substitutionary atonement
- Justification by faith
- The physical resurrection
- The bodily return of Christ at the end of the age.
- Christ performed miracles
Fundamentalism (and its Differences with Reformed Theology)
- The absence of historical perspective;
- Ignores the Scriptures highly diverse literary genres;
- The lack of appreciation of scholarship; aversion toward any secondary theological training; anti-intellectual;
- The substitution of brief, skeletal, superficial creeds for the historic confessions;
- The lack of concern with precise formulation of Christian doctrine; highly averse to theology;
- Pietistic, perfectionist tendencies, often moralistic (i.e., major upon "issues" such as protesting Harry Potter movies; separating with Christians who are not KJV only);Guilt-Centered (Fundamentalism) Vs. Gospel Centered (Reformed) Sanctification
- One-sided other-worldliness - reclusive: church separate from the culture - the holy huddle (i.e., a lack of effort to impact their communities & transform culture);
- A penchant for futuristic chiliasm (or: dispensational pre-millennialism);
- They embrace some form of Manicheanism (or Greek dualism);
- Often demonize their opposition and are reactionary;
- Envy modernist cultural/political hegemony and try to overturn the powers that be through political brute force rather than persuasion; Thus are often viewed by outsiders more like a political lobby than representatives of Christ;
- Arminian tendency in theology (synergistic)